Developing APIs for Open Finance Ecosystems

Open Finance Programs introduce a highly collaborative and dynamic environment where APIs are the primary vehicle for secure, standardized communication between diverse ecosystem participants. Unlike internal enterprise APIs, Open Finance APIs are consumed by external institutions with varying technological capabilities and business models. As such, the stakes for getting them right—from day one—are significantly higher.

Challenges While Developing New APIs for Open Finance

Developing a new API within the Open Finance ecosystem is inherently complex, significantly more so than creating standard enterprise or commercial APIs. Several factors contribute to this complexity.

Even Adapted APIs Are New

Creating a new API typically involves adapting existing concepts or standards from other jurisdictions or ecosystems. For instance, implementing Payment Initiation APIs is common in many regions. However, each new ecosystem introduces unique contextual elements—such as local regulations, participant profiles, technology constraints, and user behaviors—which make even adapted APIs fundamentally new. This context-specific adaptation demands significant analysis, customizations, extensive testing, and substantial adjustments, resulting in numerous iterations before reaching a stable implementation.

Diverse API Consumers with Varying Technological and Functional Expertise

Open Finance APIs are used by a broad spectrum of participants, ranging from large, technologically mature banks with extensive technical teams to smaller fintech startups with limited developer resources. This diversity leads to significant variations in implementation capabilities, consumer expectations, technological frameworks, and usage patterns.

APIs must accommodate varying degrees of technological maturity and business needs, providing comprehensive documentation, robust support channels, and clear guidelines that consider the varied expertise and resources of different stakeholders.

Limited Knowledge of Security Profiles

Security standards like the Financial-grade API (FAPI) profile are highly sophisticated and typically unfamiliar to many ecosystem participants, especially those new to Open Finance. Even if participants fully grasp the business functionalities provided by the APIs, insufficient knowledge of intricate security requirements often leads to implementation challenges, integration problems, delays in deployment, and potential vulnerabilities.

Addressing limited knowledge involves providing specialized security training, detailed and user-friendly security documentation, workshops, and support channels specifically geared towards bridging knowledge gaps in security implementation.

Disparity Between Functional and Security Expertise

Individuals or teams responsible for API design often possess deep functional knowledge but may lack comprehensive expertise in security protocols. This disparity can lead to inefficiencies, performance issues, gaps in documentation, or severe security vulnerabilities within the API implementation. Resolving this requires establishing clear collaboration processes, ensuring close cooperation between functional and security specialists during the API design and development stages. Cross-functional reviews and joint training sessions can significantly improve the quality and security of the resulting API.

These complexities imply that APIs undergo significant evolution from their initial versions, driven primarily by participant feedback and real-world usage scenarios. Establishing a robust API Development Lifecycle is therefore crucial to minimize rework, efficiently integrate feedback, accelerate API maturity, and ensure a high-quality, stable, secure final product.

Recommended API Development Lifecycle Stages

To effectively manage the complexity of Open Finance API development, it is essential to break the lifecycle into structured and well-defined phases. Each stage builds upon the previous one, gradually increasing the level of certainty and ecosystem alignment—starting from initial design and ending with continuous production monitoring. This phased approach ensures that feedback loops are embedded from the beginning, risks are systematically reduced, and interoperability is validated at every step.

The diagram below illustrates this sequential API development lifecycle, from early design to post-deployment monitoring. It serves as a high-level reference for understanding how each phase contributes to ensuring a robust, compliant, and interoperable API ecosystem:

API Development Phase

The initial phase involves designing the API to a minimum viable product stage (beta.1), incorporating inputs from product managers, UX designers, business analysts, and API technical experts. This stage emphasizes extensive internal reviews, scenario modeling, edge case analysis, and proactive identification of functional gaps, potential inefficiencies, and security vulnerabilities.

Deliverables include comprehensive documentation (API specification, Implementation Guide, UX Guidelines) that clearly communicates all relevant requirements and specifications.

API Iteration Phase

Participants begin implementation in a sandbox environment, providing essential real-world feedback. This stage requires:

• Sandbox environments available for participant API implementation and iterative testing.

• Accessible and open communication channels (e.g., forums, dedicated support desks) for participant queries and continuous feedback.

• Structured processes for systematically incorporating feedback into incremental releases (beta.2, rc.1).

• Defined mechanisms ensuring active participant engagement, timely feedback collection, and ongoing evaluation of feedback quality.

Releases must carefully balance timing (providing sufficient intervals for implementation and testing) and scope (manageable increments to ensure clear understanding and implementation). Clearly distinguishing between non-breaking changes (backward-compatible enhancements) and breaking changes (which require significant rework by participants) is crucial to managing ecosystem impacts effectively and transparently.

Go Live Phase

The go-live milestone signifies the transition to real-user interactions. Essential criteria before going live include:

• Comprehensive participant readiness, demonstrated through successful API implementations.

• Robust validation and interoperability capabilities clearly evidenced by participant testing outcomes.

• Transparent, reliable validation mechanisms and public demonstration methods that verify participant compliance to the entire ecosystem.

Future post-go-live changes should strictly adhere to structured versioning processes and undergo all preceding lifecycle stages, even if simplified, to ensure continued stability and user trust.

Production Pilot Phase

Although optional, production pilots are strongly recommended for significant API changes or major version updates due to associated risks. Production pilots involve:

• Bilateral interoperability testing among ecosystem participants, validating real-world interaction scenarios.

• Use of dedicated Production Testing Tools, facilitating automated or self-service testing across various scenarios—including edge cases, error handling, and security checks—without extensive participant modifications.

This combination ensures thorough, detailed testing and quick identification and resolution of interoperability and compliance issues before broad user exposure occurs.

Production Monitoring Phase

Ongoing monitoring ensures sustained API conformity, performance, and security compliance post-launch. Given continual changes such as software updates, security enhancements, infrastructure modifications, and regulatory updates, automated, continuous monitoring tools and proactive incident response processes are essential to maintain API quality, interoperability, performance, and security standards over time.

This comprehensive lifecycle addresses the specific challenges encountered in Open Finance API development, ensuring robust, secure, interoperable APIs that continually adapt and respond effectively to participant feedback and real-world usage scenarios.

Treat APIs as Ecosystem-Grade Products

Open Finance APIs are not just integration interfaces—they are ecosystem-grade products that demand intentional design, rigorous iteration, and sustained operational discipline. Failing to account for the complexity of multi-organization consumption, evolving regulation, and security expectations can result in costly rewrites, ecosystem fragmentation, or even regulatory non-compliance.

By adopting a structured API development lifecycle—one that embeds feedback loops, emphasizes interoperability, and accounts for both functional and security considerations—ecosystem operators and participants can avoid early pitfalls and accelerate time to value.

Whether you’re just beginning to define your first API or preparing to launch a new version into production, the key is to build for change and design for collaboration. Ensuring the stability and security of your APIs is not a one-off task—it is an ongoing commitment that underpins the success of the entire Open Finance initiative.

Contact with Raidiam to get specialist advisory services, market education & training, strategic support, and more. Create an ecosystem from scratch using Raidiam Trust Platform and ensure the offered APIs meet all the requirements with Raidiam Assure Services.