Skip to main content

Securing Agentic AI Access: Trust, Identity, and Authentication

· 10 min read
Wojciech Kotłowski
Senior Technical Writer
Łukasz Jaromin
Head of Standards and Product Strategy

As Agentic AI systems—from intelligent copilots to fully autonomous task agents—become part of everyday operations, they’re gaining the ability to make decisions, interact with APIs, and perform actions without direct human oversight.

This autonomy brings enormous productivity potential, but also new security, governance, and trust challenges. Without clear mechanisms for agent authentication, identity verification, and access control, AI agents could:

  • Operate without proper authorization

  • Access sensitive systems or data

  • Act without traceable accountability

These gaps create opportunities for untrusted or malicious agents to enter your environment—intentionally or unintentionally.

What Are AI Agents

In this post, we’ll explore how to secure Agentic AI access by building trust at the identity layer—not by reinventing the wheel, but by applying proven security standards.

While some groups are proposing entirely new mechanisms for securing AI agents, the reality is that we already have a strong foundation. Technologies like OAuth 2.1, OpenID Connect (OIDC), Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), OpenID Federation, and Trust Frameworks are already designed to handle both machine-to-machine interactions and user-driven scenarios—where consent, data access control, and verifiable identity are essential.

These standards have been battle-tested in securing APIs, cloud services, and cross-organization integrations. With the right implementation, they can provide verifiable, interoperable, and scalable trust for AI agents without starting from scratch.

Using PKI for AI Agent Identity and Authentication

A Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) allows you to bind a cryptographic identity to each AI agent through digital certificates. These certificates, issued by trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs), enable agents to:

  • Establish mutual TLS (mTLS) connections for a secure communication channel

  • Authenticate themselves using mTLS client authentication

  • Optionally, sign their requests and responses for non-repudiation

  • Participate in a governance-backed trust chain that links to an organizational or ecosystem root

When combined with a directory of authorized participants and agents, PKI can significantly strengthen Agentic AI security. This approach treats AI agents like any other machine entity — provisioning them with certificates, managing their lifecycle, and revoking trust if needed.

Why PKI Works for AI Agents

  • mTLS and Token Binding: Certificates can be bound to OAuth/OIDC access tokens. Even if an attacker gains access to a token, they cannot use it without the corresponding certificate.

  • Encryption and Signing: Public–private key pairs allow agents to encrypt sensitive data in transit and sign messages, ensuring authenticity and integrity.

  • Familiar Security Model: An AI agent calling APIs is still a machine calling APIs — the same protections used for applications, services, and IoT devices apply here.

  • Lifecycle Control: PKI supports revocation, rotation, and short-lived certificates for ephemeral agents, reducing the exposure window for compromised credentials.

Using OpenID Federation to Govern AI Agent Access Across Domains

In many real-world deployments, AI agents don’t stay inside a single system. They call APIs from external vendors, exchange data with partners, or operate in cross-domain ecosystems. Manually configuring trust for each agent and endpoint quickly becomes unmanageable.

OpenID Federation addresses this by providing a standards-based framework to establish and govern trust relationships between autonomous entities — whether they’re users, organizations, or AI agents. In addition to PKI — with which it can be harmonized — OpenID Federation conveys rich metadata, enables automated client registration, and standardizes trust establishment in ways that support dynamic, evolving Agentic AI environments.

Federated AI Agent Ecosystems

In a federated agent ecosystem:

  • Registration with a Trust Anchor: Agents (or their hosting services) register under a trusted authority.

  • Signed Metadata Exchange: Each agent publishes cryptographically signed metadata describing its identity, endpoints, capabilities, and access rules.

  • Policy-Driven Trust Delegation: The trust anchor can delegate enrollment and trust decisions to subdomains, departments, or partner organizations.

  • Dynamic Discovery: Agents can discover trusted peers automatically via standardized metadata endpoints — no manual key or trust list updates required.

OpenID Federation: Security Benefits for Agentic AI

OpenID Federation brings clear security advantages for AI agents operating in complex environments. It enables cross-domain scalability, allowing multi-agent and multi-organization ecosystems to function even as participants join, leave, or change capabilities over time. Governance is fine-grained and policy-driven, so administrators can define exactly which agents are permitted to access specific APIs, under what conditions, and with what proof of identity.

Because it’s a standards-based approach, OpenID Federation works seamlessly with OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, PKI, and other trust mechanisms. This means it can deliver strong authentication, token-based authorization, and high levels of identity assurance without requiring custom integrations. Operationally, it streamlines lifecycle management: onboarding or retiring an agent can be achieved by updating its signed metadata, without requiring full infrastructure redeployment or credential reissuance.

When combined with PKI for robust cryptographic authentication, OpenID Federation provides the distributed trust governance needed for AI agents to operate securely across organizational and ecosystem boundaries—without sacrificing speed or agility.

Containing AI Agent Proliferation and Delegated Authority

In an Agentic AI ecosystem, delegation is common: a primary agent might spawn sub-agents to handle subtasks, run processes in parallel, or interact with different APIs simultaneously. While this can improve efficiency, it also introduces a serious security challenge. Without strong controls, autonomous delegation can lead to uncontrolled agent proliferation, where hundreds or thousands of agents operate without clear oversight, defined permissions, or even visibility into their actions.

This is where trust frameworks such as PKI and OpenID Federation become essential. Each sub-agent operates with its own assigned set of permissions, ensuring it only performs the actions it is explicitly authorized for. With scoped trust, those permissions can be tightly restricted in time, scope, and capability, preventing a short-lived task from becoming a persistent, over-privileged actor. And with chain-of-trust validation, every agent in the network can be traced back to its origin and verified, ensuring that no rogue or unauthorized processes are operating undetected.

By enforcing these principles, organizations can embrace the scalability of agent-based systems without losing control over who is acting, under what authority, and for how long.

AI Agent Identity Enables Provenance and Accountability

In an Agentic AI ecosystem, identity does far more than grant access — it provides the context and history needed to understand how agents operate over time. By issuing unique credentials–identities–to each agent, organizations can track not only who created the agent but also what capabilities it was given, which systems it interacted with, and under what authority.

These credentials can carry rich metadata, such as the model version, training data lineage, or the specific task scope for which the agent was authorized. When combined with cryptographic authentication from PKI and governance policies from OpenID Federation, this identity data forms a complete provenance record.

Such a record is invaluable for audit, compliance, and incident response. If an agent takes an unexpected action, its entire operational history can be traced — from the moment of creation, through every delegated task, to the precise API calls it made. In regulated or high-stakes environments, this provenance trail is not just a best practice; it’s a critical safeguard for safe, accountable automation.

PKI vs OpenID Federation vs DIDs: Which Trust Model Fits Agentic AI

FeaturePKIOpenID FederationDID-Based Trust
Root of TrustCertificate Authority (CA)Trust anchor(s) and intermediariesDistributed ledger/blockchain
Agent OnboardingCertificate enrollment, CA approvalEntity registration with federated authorityDID document creation
InteroperabilityHigh (Web2/traditional systems)High (federated/cloud-native/KYC scenarios)High (Web3, SSI ecosystems)
RevocationCertificate revocation lists/OCSPTrust Chain checks on regular basisOn-ledger or resolvable
DecentralizationTypically less (central trust anchor)Federated (semi-centralized, flexible topology)Fully decentralized
AI Agent UseIdentity verification, TLS/JWS comms, signed outputsFederated discovery, dynamic enrollment, policy enforcementSelf-sovereign identities

Choosing the Right Model for Securing AI Agent Access

The right trust model for your AI agents depends on the scale of your ecosystem, the regulatory context, and your governance priorities.

  • PKI is best suited for regulated or enterprise environments that require strong identity assurance and robust audit trails. It offers mature lifecycle management, cryptographic authentication, and proven interoperability with enterprise systems.

  • OpenID Federation is ideal for environments with dynamic connections between departments, vendors, or partners. It harmonizes with PKI, aligns with OAuth, and supports automated discovery and registration—eliminating the need for manual trust list updates.

  • DIDs (Decentralized Identifiers) are a good fit for privacy-preserving or decentralized agent ecosystems. They allow portable, verifiable credentials that work across contexts with minimal reliance on a central authority.

In practice, many organizations will use a hybrid model — for example, issuing PKI-backed identities, federating them using OpenID metadata exchange, and linking them to DID documents for cross-context portability. This layered approach combines the strengths of each model to balance security, flexibility, and interoperability.

Start Small: Establish Minimum Viable Trust

You don’t need to implement a complete trust fabric from day one. A minimum viable trust approach lets you reduce risk while building the foundations for future scaling:

  • Assign short-lived credentials to agents, ideally scoped to a specific task, API, or environment to limit blast radius.

  • Authenticate all API calls using mTLS or signed JWTs bound to the agent’s identity, ensuring that tokens alone are not enough to impersonate the agent.

  • Register each agent in a lightweight metadata registry, capturing its purpose, permissions, creation date, and lifecycle status for auditability.

By starting small, you can experiment with agentic tooling in a controlled, auditable way while progressively layering in stronger trust mechanisms as your ecosystem grows.

Final Thoughts: Trust Is the True Enabler of Agentic AI

The AI community often jumps straight to authentication, authorization, and consent—as if they’re the whole story. Yet, in agentic AI, the real foundation is trust: the ability for agents, MCP servers, and other participants to verify each other’s identity and intent. Whether operating in an enterprise, consortium, national, or global ecosystem, PKI, OpenID Federation, and emerging DID-based models provide the building blocks for secure, interoperable, and scalable AI collaboration.

The key is to start with minimum viable trust, enforce it consistently, and evolve toward a layered trust fabric that can span teams, partners, and even industries. Done right, trust becomes a productivity multiplier—allowing AI agents to move faster, act autonomously, and still remain accountable.

The next wave of AI adoption won’t be defined solely by model performance—it will be defined by who you trust, how you prove it, and how quickly you can adapt that trust as agents evolve.

If you’re building or deploying Agentic AI, now is the time to:

  • Map your current trust and identity model for AI agents

  • Identify gaps in authentication, policy, and provenance

  • Pilot PKI or OpenID Federation in a controlled, high-value workflow

Because the sooner your agents can operate within a trusted framework, the sooner you can scale them—safely, confidently, and without fear of losing control.

API Security Report

Helping Enterprises Recognize and Address Critical Risks

More than 80% of organizations are exposing sensitive data with weak API security

Download Now →